The Constitutional Court’s Journey to Bureaucratic Reform
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the bureaucratic ethics of the Constitutional Court related to the objectives and constitutional values in the decisions of the Constitutional Court judges, as well as the role of bureaucratic reform based on Presidential Regulation Number 81 of 2010. The method used is a literature study. This method involves analyzing secondary data from Constitutional Court decisions, laws and regulations, and other scientific literature focusing on the research topic. The results showed that ethical violations by Constitutional Court judges are a serious challenge to the integrity of the Constitutional Court institution. After the amendment of the 1945 Constitution after the reform, the Constitutional Court became the highest judicial institution against corruption, collusion, and nepotism. Despite four amendments, legal irregularities in the Constitutional Court still occur, indicating that post-reform law enforcement has not been optimal. The main challenge is the inability of the bureaucracy to serve the public interest. The importance of bureaucratic reform is illustrated by the need to improve the integrity of the Constitutional Court, rebuild public trust, and ensure that this institution continues to function as a justice enforcer that serves the public interest.
References
Arfiani, Putra, I., & Fadhila, A. (2022). Pelanggaran Etik Hakim Konstitusi dan Rekomendasi Penegakan Hukum pada Kasus Pemalsuan Putusan. Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(4), 1234–1248. https://swarajustisia.unespadang.ac.id/index.php/UJSJ/article/view/436/334
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-undang. Yasrif Watampone.
Batul, S., & Nst, A. (2024). Peran Konstitusi dalam Membentuk Tata Negara yang Demokratis. Journal on Education, 06(02), 11760–11769. https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/download/4830/3914/
Bintang, D., Roido, M. B., & Julianna, G. A. (2023). Pelanggaran Kode Etik: Pelanggaran Kode Etik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anwar Usman Selaku Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 47–54.
Christensen, T., Roness, P., Arne Røvik, K., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Organization Theory and the Public Sector. In Organization Theory and the Public Sector. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415449014
Deu, M. (2015). Kode Etik Hakim dan Komisi Yudisial di Indonesia. Lex et Societatis, III(1), 44–54. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexetsocietatis/article/download/7069/6582
Fahri, M. (2021). Potret Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintahan Dalam Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Dinamika, 1(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.54895/dinamika.v1i1.767
Febriansyah, F., & Prayitno, S. (2023). Analisis Pelanggaran Kode Etik dalam Kasus Pemberhentian Ketua Mk Anwar Usman Terkait Putusan Batas Usia Capres dan Cawapres Pada Pemilu 2024. Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 01(2), 85–94.
Handayani, I. (2018). Penegakan Pelanggaran Kode Etik Hakim di Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Analisis Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 01/MKMK-SPP/II/2017) (Issue 01). https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/44286
Ikaputri, V. A. (2023). Potret Penyederhanaan Birokrasi Dalam Menunjang Reformasi Birokrasi. Media Bina Ilmiah, 18(1978), 31–41. http://binapatria.id/index.php/MBI/article/view/597%0Ahttp://binapatria.id/index.php/MBI/article/download/597/433
Jung, C. S. (2014). Why are goals important in the public sector? Exploring the benefits of goal clarity for reducing turnover intention. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus058
Jurdi, F., Hanapi, R. A., & Hidayat, T. (2021). Optimalisasi Fungsi Pengawasan Dewan Etik Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(3), 689. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no3.2763
Lailam, T. (2020). Membangun Constitutional Morality Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), 511. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.511-530
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2013). Melanggar Kode Etik dan Perilaku, Akil Diberhentikan Tidak Hormat. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=9163
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2015). Peran dan Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=10958
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2023). MKMK Berhentikan Anwar Usman dari Jabatan Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=19751&menu=2
Peraturan Presiden, & Indonesia, R. (2010). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 Grand Design Reformasi BIirokrasi 2010-2025. 1999, 1–38.
Sa’adah, N. (2019). Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi Dan Konstitusi Khususnya Dalam Menjalankan Constitutional Review. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.235-247
Saraswati, M. K., & Adi, E. A. W. (2022). Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara Ke Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Berdasarkan Analisis SWOT. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 6(2), 4042–4052. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v6i2.3086
Siagian. (1994). Patologi Birokrasi: Analisis, Identifikasi dan Terapinya. Ghalia Indonesia.
Sudirman L, Hasanuddin Hasim, & Abdul Hafid. (2019). Implementasi Kode Etik Dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 14(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v14i2.1551
Yunas, N. S. (2016). Kepemimpinan Dan Masa Depan Reformasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia. Dimensi, 9(2), 103–114. https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/dimensi/article/view/3744
Zed, M. (2008). Metode peneletian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor.
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Noor Khatija Ibrahim, Rosyida Rahmawati, Endang Rudiatin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors confirm that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published (online) in the journal IJABO (International Journal Administration, Business & Organization) by the Asosiasi Ahli Administrasi Indonesia (A3i), Bandung, Indonesia. The author’s name will be evident in the article. The publisher makes all decisions regarding the layout and distribution of the work.
- Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themself to defend the interests of the publisher and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows the redistribution and reuse of papers provided the authorship is properly credited.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citations of published work.
