The Constitutional Court’s Journey to Bureaucratic Reform
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the bureaucratic ethics of the Constitutional Court related to the objectives and constitutional values in the decisions of the Constitutional Court judges, as well as the role of bureaucratic reform based on Presidential Regulation Number 81 of 2010. The method used is a literature study. This method involves analyzing secondary data from Constitutional Court decisions, laws and regulations, and other scientific literature focusing on the research topic. The results showed that ethical violations by Constitutional Court judges are a serious challenge to the integrity of the Constitutional Court institution. After the amendment of the 1945 Constitution after the reform, the Constitutional Court became the highest judicial institution against corruption, collusion, and nepotism. Despite four amendments, legal irregularities in the Constitutional Court still occur, indicating that post-reform law enforcement has not been optimal. The main challenge is the inability of the bureaucracy to serve the public interest. The importance of bureaucratic reform is illustrated by the need to improve the integrity of the Constitutional Court, rebuild public trust, and ensure that this institution continues to function as a justice enforcer that serves the public interest.
References
Arfiani, Putra, I., & Fadhila, A. (2022). Pelanggaran Etik Hakim Konstitusi dan Rekomendasi Penegakan Hukum pada Kasus Pemalsuan Putusan. Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(4), 1234–1248. https://swarajustisia.unespadang.ac.id/index.php/UJSJ/article/view/436/334
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-undang. Yasrif Watampone.
Batul, S., & Nst, A. (2024). Peran Konstitusi dalam Membentuk Tata Negara yang Demokratis. Journal on Education, 06(02), 11760–11769. https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/download/4830/3914/
Bintang, D., Roido, M. B., & Julianna, G. A. (2023). Pelanggaran Kode Etik: Pelanggaran Kode Etik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anwar Usman Selaku Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 47–54.
Christensen, T., Roness, P., Arne Røvik, K., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Organization Theory and the Public Sector. In Organization Theory and the Public Sector. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415449014
Deu, M. (2015). Kode Etik Hakim dan Komisi Yudisial di Indonesia. Lex et Societatis, III(1), 44–54. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexetsocietatis/article/download/7069/6582
Fahri, M. (2021). Potret Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintahan Dalam Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Dinamika, 1(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.54895/dinamika.v1i1.767
Febriansyah, F., & Prayitno, S. (2023). Analisis Pelanggaran Kode Etik dalam Kasus Pemberhentian Ketua Mk Anwar Usman Terkait Putusan Batas Usia Capres dan Cawapres Pada Pemilu 2024. Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 01(2), 85–94.
Handayani, I. (2018). Penegakan Pelanggaran Kode Etik Hakim di Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Analisis Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 01/MKMK-SPP/II/2017) (Issue 01). https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/44286
Ikaputri, V. A. (2023). Potret Penyederhanaan Birokrasi Dalam Menunjang Reformasi Birokrasi. Media Bina Ilmiah, 18(1978), 31–41. http://binapatria.id/index.php/MBI/article/view/597%0Ahttp://binapatria.id/index.php/MBI/article/download/597/433
Jung, C. S. (2014). Why are goals important in the public sector? Exploring the benefits of goal clarity for reducing turnover intention. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus058
Jurdi, F., Hanapi, R. A., & Hidayat, T. (2021). Optimalisasi Fungsi Pengawasan Dewan Etik Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(3), 689. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no3.2763
Lailam, T. (2020). Membangun Constitutional Morality Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), 511. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.511-530
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2013). Melanggar Kode Etik dan Perilaku, Akil Diberhentikan Tidak Hormat. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=9163
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2015). Peran dan Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=10958
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2023). MKMK Berhentikan Anwar Usman dari Jabatan Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=19751&menu=2
Peraturan Presiden, & Indonesia, R. (2010). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 Grand Design Reformasi BIirokrasi 2010-2025. 1999, 1–38.
Sa’adah, N. (2019). Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi Dan Konstitusi Khususnya Dalam Menjalankan Constitutional Review. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.235-247
Saraswati, M. K., & Adi, E. A. W. (2022). Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara Ke Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Berdasarkan Analisis SWOT. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 6(2), 4042–4052. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v6i2.3086
Siagian. (1994). Patologi Birokrasi: Analisis, Identifikasi dan Terapinya. Ghalia Indonesia.
Sudirman L, Hasanuddin Hasim, & Abdul Hafid. (2019). Implementasi Kode Etik Dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 14(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v14i2.1551
Yunas, N. S. (2016). Kepemimpinan Dan Masa Depan Reformasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia. Dimensi, 9(2), 103–114. https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/dimensi/article/view/3744
Zed, M. (2008). Metode peneletian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor.
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Noor Khatija Ibrahim, Rosyida Rahmawati, Endang Rudiatin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors retain copyright to their articles, excluding any third-party images and other material that are subject to copyright by their respective owners.
By submitting the manuscript to the International Journal Administration, Business & Organization (IJABO), the author agrees to this policy. No special document approval is required.
- All the author(s) agree the above article for publication in the Journal «International Journal Administration, Business & Organization (IJABO)».
- The above-mentioned article is the author(s)’ original work and has not been published before and is not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- All the author(s) agree with the journal’s «International Journal Administration, Business & Organization (IJABO)»
- The Article was not submitted for review to another journal while under review by this journal and will not be submitted to any other journal.
- I/we have given final approval of the submitted manuscript.
- The Article contain no libelous or other unlawful statements and do not contain any materials that violate any personal or proprietary rights of any other person or entity.
- The author(s) no conflict of interest that may affect the integrity and the validity of the findings presented in it.
- I/we have obtained written permission from copyright owners for any excerpts from copyrighted works that are included and have credited the sources in the Article.
- If I/we am using any personal details or images of patients, research subjects or other individuals, I have obtained all consents required by applicable law and complied with the publisher’s policies relating to the use of such images or personal information.
- All Authors are aware that they can deposit (self-archive) (a) submitted article, (b) accepted for publication article or (c) the final published version of the article in any suitable source (e.g., institutional or other specialized repositories, personal websites, etc.) without embargo period. In case of self-archiving authors should also acknowledge the Publisher and the Publication and deposit an URL to the article (if available).
Licence
International Journal Administration, Business & Organization (IJABO) is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 4.0 Internasional license (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license permits anyone to:.
Sharing - copy and redistribute this material in any form or format;
Adaptation - modify, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose.
Attribution - You must include the appropriate name, include a link to the license, and state that changes have been made. You may do this in a manner that is appropriate, but not implying that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Share Alike - If you compose, modify, or make derivative works of this material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original material.
